);
}
/* ===================== SENTINEL (drawer) ========================== */
const SENTINEL_SCENARIOS = [
{ q: 'A dropped-object near-miss just happened at height — what do I do?', steps: [
'Make the area safe and account for all personnel before anything else.',
'Log it as a High-Potential (HIPO) event — AI flags this as your 3rd at-height event on P-204 this quarter.',
'Launch the AI Investigation Assistant on INC-26-031 — it will reconstruct the sequence and run a 5-Why / TapRooT analysis.',
'Raise CAPA-26-040 on lifting controls (AI pre-drafted it) and assign to the HSE Manager.',
'Issue a Learning Alert to all crews working at height across active projects.',
], cite: 'ISO 45001 §10.2 · IOGP LSR' },
{ q: 'A permit needs approval but it overlaps a hot-work permit nearby', steps: [
'AI detects a SIMOPS conflict: PTW-26-114 (N₂ confined space) overlaps PTW-26-113 (hot work) in the same area.',
'Do not approve in parallel — request a sequencing review or spatial separation.',
'Confirm gas tests, rescue plan and standby are in place for the confined-space entry.',
'Approve only once the SIMOPS risk score drops below threshold; the decision is logged to the audit trail.',
], cite: 'HAZID · PTW Procedure' },
{ q: 'We received an NCR that looks familiar — is it systemic?', steps: [
'AI matched NCR-26-058 to 2 prior NCRs on bolt-torque records — this is a repeat signature, not isolated.',
'Treat it as systemic: the root cause is likely a procedure/competency gap, not a one-off error.',
'Open the AI root-cause view and accept the suggested CAPA targeting the torque-recording procedure.',
'Add the affected inspectors to a competency refresh and verify effectiveness before closing.',
], cite: 'ISO 9001 §10.2' },
{ q: 'How ready are we for the upcoming client audit?', steps: [
'Current audit-readiness signals: ISO 45001 audit in 12 days, 1 open finding, 1 overdue CAPA.',
'AI predicts the most likely findings: lifting-controls CAPA closure evidence and 7 expiring certifications.',
'Close CAPA-26-040 and renew the 7 certs before P-211 mobilization to lift the score above 90.',
'Generate the audit pack — IMS manual, project HSE plans, training matrix and CAPA register — in one click.',
], cite: 'ISO 19011 · Management Review' },
];
/* ---------- conversational cross-module AI (reasons across the data) ---------- */
const QHSE_QA = [
{ m: ['block', 'p-211', 'p211', 'mobiliz', 'deploy'], sources: ['Competency', 'Asset Integrity', 'Contractors'], nav: 'competency', answer: "P-211 mobilization is blocked by three things I'm tracking across modules: (1) 7 certifications expire before deployment — 2 N₂-unit operators are missing a valid Aramco CSTP; (2) Hydrotest Pump HP-03 certification is overdue; (3) Gulf Crane Hire's insurance has lapsed (HSE score 78). Sequence: renew the certs, re-certify HP-03, suspend the contractor until insured. That protects both schedule and HSE readiness." },
{ m: ['audit', 'ready', '45001', '19011', 'assess'], sources: ['ISO Compliance', 'CAPA', 'Competency'], nav: 'compliance', answer: "Audit readiness: ISO 45001 surveillance is in 12 days with 1 open finding and 1 overdue CAPA. I predict the two most likely findings are (a) closure evidence for lifting-controls CAPA-26-040 and (b) the 7 expiring certifications. Close both and the 45001 score moves from 91 to ~93 — clearing the audit. The audit pack can be generated in one click." },
{ m: ['risk', 'biggest', 'top', 'danger', 'concern'], sources: ['Risk & HAZID', 'Permit to Work', 'Incidents'], nav: 'risk', answer: "Top live risks: (1) SIMOPS on P-204 — a confined-space N₂ permit overlaps hot work (score 16/25); (2) confined-space entry on P-211 with high consequence; (3) the lifting-controls CAPA is overdue and tied to 3 at-height near-misses. I recommend sequencing the P-204 permits first, then closing the lifting CAPA." },
{ m: ['incident', 'trend', 'height', 'dropped', 'pattern', 'near-miss', 'hipo'], sources: ['Incidents', 'CAPA'], nav: 'incidents', answer: "Incident trend: at-height events are your emerging pattern — INC-26-031 is the 3rd dropped-object near-miss on P-204 this quarter. I assess this as a systemic lifting/tethering control gap, not isolated. The AI investigation already produced the root cause and a CAPA; broadcasting the 'secure tools at height' learning alert to all crews is recommended." },
{ m: ['ncr', 'quality', 'repeat', 'torque', 'non-conform', 'nonconform'], sources: ['Quality / NCR'], nav: 'quality', answer: "Quality signal: NCR-26-058 (bolt-torque records) matches 2 prior NCRs — a repeat signature, i.e. systemic. The likely root cause is a missing verification gate in the torque-recording step under schedule pressure. The fix that worked before (a mandatory record-verification gate + inspector refresh) is recommended again." },
{ m: ['cert', 'expir', 'renew', 'competen', 'training', 'medical'], sources: ['Competency'], nav: 'competency', answer: "7 certifications expire within 30 days, concentrated before P-211: 3 N₂-unit operators and 4 lifting-gear certs, with 2 operators also missing a valid Aramco CSTP. The renewal/training plan is ready — scheduling it now keeps P-211 fully crewed and audit-ready." },
{ m: ['contractor', 'crane', 'insurance', 'vendor', 'subcontract'], sources: ['Contractors', 'Incidents'], nav: 'contractors', answer: "Contractor risk: Gulf Crane Hire's insurance has lapsed, HSE score is 78 (below threshold), yet prequalification renews in 20 days. I recommend suspending mobilization until insurance and HSE are restored — this contractor supplies cranes to the same P-204 lifting scope as the recent near-miss." },
{ m: ['environment', 'spill', '14001', 'effluent', 'emission', 'waste'], sources: ['ISO Compliance', 'Risk & HAZID'], nav: 'compliance', answer: "Environmental: the GAMEP environmental-permit obligation is overdue (audit-critical), and chemical-cleaning effluent on P-219 is a High-significance aspect sitting in 'Action'. I recommend actioning the GAMEP report and verifying bunding + licensed disposal before P-219 chemical cleaning starts." },
{ m: ['capa', 'overdue', 'corrective', 'effective'], sources: ['CAPA'], nav: 'capa', answer: "CAPA status: 1 overdue (lifting controls, audit-critical) and 1 ready to close (hand-protection RA refresh has evidence — I assess it effective). Run the AI effectiveness check before closing any CAPA; it scans 90 days for recurrence and checks evidence adequacy." },
{ m: ['simops', 'conflict', 'hot work', 'parallel'], sources: ['Permit to Work', 'Risk & HAZID'], nav: 'ptw', answer: "SIMOPS: PTW-26-114 (N₂ confined-space entry) overlaps PTW-26-113 (hot work) in the same area on P-204. Do not approve in parallel — sequence the activities or separate them spatially, confirm gas tests and a rescue plan, then approve once the SIMOPS score drops below threshold." },
{ m: ['hse', 'score', 'trir', 'performance', 'lti', 'safety', 'statistic'], sources: ['Business Excellence', 'Incidents'], nav: 'dashboard', answer: "HSE performance: 312 LTI-free days, 1.84M man-hours YTD, TRIR 0.42 and trending down. 2 open incidents, both with investigations and CAPAs in progress. Your at-height near-misses are the one cluster to watch — closing the lifting CAPA addresses it." },
];
function authorizedFor(cert) { return DB.competency.filter((c) => c.certs[cert] === 'V').map((c) => DB.staffById(c.staff).name); }
function answerQuery(q) {
const t = q.toLowerCase();
if (/(who|authoriz|qualif|competent|can)/.test(t) && /(confined|cse|space)/.test(t)) {
const names = authorizedFor('CSE');
return { answer: `Authorized for confined-space entry (valid CSE + medical): ${names.join(', ')}. One N₂ operator's Aramco CSTP has lapsed, so I exclude them from client-certified CSE tasks until it's renewed.`, sources: ['Competency'], nav: 'competency', conf: 'High' };
}
let best = null, score = 0;
QHSE_QA.forEach((e) => { const s = e.m.reduce((n, w) => n + (t.includes(w) ? 1 : 0), 0); if (s > score) { score = s; best = e; } });
if (best && score > 0) return { ...best, conf: 'High' };
return { answer: "I reason across HSE, quality, compliance, risk, permits, competency, assets, projects and contractors. Try: “what's blocking P-211?”, “are we audit ready?”, “biggest risks now?”, or “who can do confined-space entry?”", sources: [], conf: 'Low' };
}
function AIChat({ onNav, height }) {
const [msgs, setMsgs] = useState([{ role: 'ai', text: 'Ask me anything about HSE, quality, compliance, risk, permits, competency, assets or projects — I reason across your live data and cite the source.' }]);
const [input, setInput] = useState('');
const [thinking, setThinking] = useState(false);
const endRef = useRef(null);
const ask = (text) => { if (!text.trim()) return; const a = answerQuery(text); setMsgs((m) => [...m, { role: 'user', text }]); setInput(''); setThinking(true); setTimeout(() => { setMsgs((m) => [...m, { role: 'ai', text: a.answer, sources: a.sources, nav: a.nav, conf: a.conf }]); setThinking(false); setTimeout(() => endRef.current && endRef.current.scrollIntoView({ block: 'nearest' }), 40); }, 680); };
const sugg = ["What's blocking P-211 mobilization?", 'Are we ready for the ISO 45001 audit?', 'What are our biggest risks right now?', 'Who is authorized for confined-space entry?'];
return (
The AI service is temporarily unavailable. Every register, form and approval still works normally — Sentinel's guidance, drafting and answers resume automatically when it reconnects.
: { onClose(); onNav(id); }} height="100%" />}
);
}
/* ===================== AI INVESTIGATION ASSISTANT =================== */
function AIInvestigation({ incident }) {
const [run, setRun] = useState(false);
const [step, setStep] = useState(0);
const phases = [
{ h: 'Reconstructed sequence', icon: 'history', body: 'Lift in progress on V-204 platform → tagline not secured → wind gust → small tool displaced → fell 4 m inside barricaded zone. No personnel beneath; barricade held.' },
{ h: '5-Why analysis', icon: 'sparkles', body: '1) Object fell → not tethered. 2) Not tethered → no tool-tethering on the task. 3) No tethering → JSA omitted dropped-object control. 4) JSA gap → generic template reused without site review. 5) Generic template → no AI/peer check at JSA approval.' },
{ h: 'Contributing factors (TapRooT)', icon: 'grid', body: 'Procedure (JSA control gap) · Human-engineering (no tethering points) · Supervision (JSA approved without review). 3rd at-height event on P-204 this quarter — systemic.' },
{ h: 'Root cause', icon: 'flag', body: 'Inadequate dropped-object controls in the JSA process for work at height — a systemic procedure & review gap, not an individual error.' },
{ h: 'Suggested CAPA', icon: 'refresh', body: 'CAPA-26-040 — Mandate tool-tethering + AI-assisted JSA review for all at-height tasks; competency refresh for supervisors. Owner: HSE Manager · Due 14 days.', action: 'Accept CAPA' },
{ h: 'Learning alert', icon: 'bell', body: 'Draft alert "Secure your tools at height" ready to broadcast to all crews on active projects. Acknowledgement tracked.', action: 'Issue learning alert' },
];
useEffect(() => {
if (!run) return;
if (step < phases.length) { const t = setTimeout(() => setStep((s) => s + 1), 700); return () => clearTimeout(t); }
}, [run, step]);
return (
AI Investigation Assistant
{!run && { setRun(true); setStep(0); }}>Run AI investigation}
{!run ?
Sentinel reconstructs the event, runs a 5-Why / TapRooT root-cause analysis, drafts the CAPA and a learning alert — you review and confirm each.
: phases.map((p, i) => (
{i < step ? : }
{p.h}
{p.action && i < step && window.toast(p.action === 'Accept CAPA' ? 'CAPA-26-040 accepted · assigned to HSE Manager' : 'Learning alert issued to all crews · acknowledgement tracking on')}>{p.action}}